El Miércoles, 29 de Abril de 2009, Alex Balashov escribió: > I agree; nothing can be forced. And yes, I do think proxy billing has > vulnerabilities and technological limitations. > > But the benefit of simplicity and QOS should also be considered in a > commercial environment. There is not a convincing reason to be > handling media if you are an ITSP / arbitrage call shop. Yes, if you > are running your own interconnected voice core, might as well, but > otherwise I think the costs and path cannot be justified. > > I actually find the opposite of what Paul says to be true; most people > seem to think media bridging is required for accurate billing and I > have to convince them otherwise, whether by proxy or B2BUA means.
I also agree on the no requeriment of handling media in order to billing. But I expect that a B2BUA (doing SST for leg_A and leg_B) is the only accurate and secure pure SIP accounting way. Best regards. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
