I also wondered the same. May be, they did not like the fact that "pres-rules" took so much time to become a standard.:)
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo<i...@aliax.net> wrote: > Hi, I'm starting with XCAP and realized that while IETF defines "pres-rules" > identifier, OMA has "added" "org.openmobilealliance.pres-rules". > > Some softphones supporting XCAP use "org.openmobilealliance.pres-rules" > instead of "pres-rules". > > Why? > > Why is allowed this kind of additions to SIP? Doesn't it break the standards > and the compatibility between applications and vendors who must choose between > using IETF specifications or OMA specifications? > > Thanks. > > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net> > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
