Hi, I'm really annoyed after realizing that RFC 5025 (presence rules in XCAP) doesn't define a *common* and *standarized* document name in order to store and get the presence rules for an user.
This is, each vendor will choose its own document name (index, index.xml, pres-rules.xml...). Then, when accesing to a XCAP server, vendor A's device will look for "index" document while vendor B's device will look for "index.xml" document. In this way, it's really impossible to get inteorperability, and I am sure that IETF has *enough* experience to know it so it should generate non- ambiguous specifications. Is it really so hard to understand that sometimes they are needed strict specifications to improve interoperability??? I'm really frustrating will all this stuff. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
