what are you trying to achieve? --- En date de : Ven 24.7.09, Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net> a écrit :
De: Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net> Objet: Re: [Sip-implementors] Any "standarized" subset of 'pres-rules' document (RFC 5025) ? À: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Date: Vendredi 24 Juillet 2009, 12h24 El Viernes, 24 de Julio de 2009, Iñaki Baz Castillo escribió: > Thanks a lot, but I get more confussed now... > > Which is the difference between OMA purpose and RCS purpose? I've found: "It is not the intention of the RCS program to create new standards but rather to specify a core feature set that can be implemented using existing standards and guidelines already defined by other forums (e.g., 3GPP, ETSI, OMA, and the GSMA). Should the experiences of the interoperability tests identify the need for further standardization or corrections to the existing standards, then these facts will be documented and communicated to the associated standards organizations." hummm, I though that OMA's purpose was the same... too complex... -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
