PRACK should sent with Route header with the Record-Route header from 183 response
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Krishna Rao Gurram Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 12:26 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Sip-implementors] Route header handling in forked scenario!!!!!! Hi All, Request you please clarify the following scenario. [cid:[email protected]] My question is whether PRACK should sent with Route header with the Record-Route header from 183 response or It should not insert Route header as Invite does not contain Route header. ________________________________ "DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be circulated or used for any purpose other than for what it is intended. If you have received this message in error,please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message. Aricent accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of the information transmitted by this email including damage from virus." _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
