On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 23:35 +0800, T Satyanarayana-A12694 wrote: > Additional round trips should be made optional (only for implementations > having concurrent codecs limitation). > > Additionally, why can't the spec be modified (or place in a BCP): > 1. to allow only a sub-set (of what is present in the offer) in the > answer (or even just one codec)
If you mean, "Is it allowed to put in the answer only a subset of the codecs that are in the offer", that is allowed now. > 2. to place a restrion on the offerer to only use one of the codecs > listed in the intersection of answer & offer. Some implementations use more than one codec, so that would have to be considered a BCP. Dale _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
