Hello Priyank, I think it's same as coma seperated values.
Regards, Sumit Jindal On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:21 PM, priyank luthra <priyank.lut...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi > What would be the behaviour of a proxy/Registrar receiving a REGISTER with > multiple path headers, like > > REGISTER > sip:REGISTRAR.EXAMPLEHOME.COM<http://registrar.examplehome.com/>SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 112.68.155.4:5060;branch=z9hG4bK34ghi7ab04 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.0.2.4:5060;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 > To: UA1 <sip:u...@examplehome.com <sip%3a...@examplehome.com>> > From: UA1 <sip:u...@examplehome.com <sip%3a...@examplehome.com> > >;tag=456248 > Call-ID: 843817637684...@998sdasdh09 > CSeq: 1826 REGISTER > Contact: <sip:u...@192.0.2.4 <sip%3a...@192.0.2.4> < > sip%3a...@192.0.2.4 <sip%253a...@192.0.2.4>>> > Supported: path > Path: <sip:P1.EXAMPLEVISITED.COM <http://p1.examplevisited.com/>;lr> > Path: <sip:proxy1.home.com;lr> > Path: <sip:proxy2.home.com;lr> > > Should this be treated the same way as if there was a single path > header with comma separated values ? Or should it return 400 BAD > request ? > > > > -- > Regards, > Priyank > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
