Why would that merit the response "FAIL?" Attila Sipos wrote:
> At risk of getting a FAIL from Mr.Balashov, does > anyone know anything about MS Outlook 2003 support for In-Reply-To? > > how to enable it? > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Iñaki > Baz Castillo > Sent: 24 November 2009 12:26 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] [RPort] Request to know unique use caseofrport > > Hi Attila, could I suggest you to use a mail client which respects and > implements the "In-Reply-To" header? Then when you reply in a thread your > mail would include such header and would appear in the corresponding thread > in any other RFC complian mail client. > > For now, every mail from you is a new "thread" in my mail client since it > doesn't include the "In-Reply-To" header (the header a client should inspect > to order the mails by threads). > > Regards. > > > El Martes, 24 de Noviembre de 2009, Attila Sipos escribió: >>>> UA needs to know and publish its public IP address/port. >> this is true in some cases. If you are a standalone UA (not using a >> SIP server) and want to receive requests, then rport is not good >> enough. (but of course, you still need an external STUN server) > > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
