On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 21:11 +0100, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > El Lunes, 7 de Diciembre de 2009, Dale Worley escribió: > > On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 00:15 +0100, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > > > I still wake up every day asking myself how SIP protocol was born > > > assuming there is no NAT... :( > > > > How long have you been involved with the IETF? A lot of IETF people > > hate NATs like the Pope hates Satan. > > Does it mean that RFC 3261 exists prior to NAT? XD
Not at all. But the fact that RFC 3261 ignores NATs is not accidental or an oversight. Only after SIP became popular in "real" situations did people work out how to make it work with NATs. Dale _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
