A doubt about UA implementation when a 302 is received as response to an INVTE. How shall de new INVITE be built? Shall the UA keep the same Call-Id, the same tags, increment CSeq, change the brach? Is this behaviour a MUST, a SHALL, a SHOULD, a MAY? We found such way of implementing it on RFC 3665 Thank you in advance _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
- [Sip-implementors] UA implementation when a 302 i... javier . ferreirogarcia
- Re: [Sip-implementors] UA implementation whe... Dale Worley
