Hi, If proxy is not maintaining the session, it would treat BYE as any other transaction and process it the same way as INVITE (treat it like any other transaction). IMO, updating the Request URI with 'Contact' header would work.
Thanks Gagandeep Bajaj -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ViVeK tAlWaR Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 11:06 AM To: 'Noble Antony T'; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Fwd: 481 Call/Transaction does not exist onBYE Hi, If proxy is maintaining call-leg then there should be Record-Route header in 180 and 200 response but as there is no Record route header present which means proxy is not maintaining session and if UAC is sending BYE for that session to proxy which is not maintained by it, it can send Call does not exist Comments expected.. Regards, Vivek -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Noble Antony T Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 10:58 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Sip-implementors] Fwd: 481 Call/Transaction does not exist on BYE I forgot to reply-all. (forwarding the mail to archive-list) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Noble Antony T <[email protected]> Date: Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:17 PM Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] 481 Call/Transaction does not exist on BYE To: Antoine Roly <[email protected]> Update the reqeust-uri, once the dialog is established, (based on the contact header.) On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Antoine Roly <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to write a small scenario to simulate a basic SIP call, using > SIPp. > I have an error, the proxy between the two SIPp instances sends back a > 481 message on the BYE. > I probably missed something. > > I found a similar problem in the mailing list archive but can't > determine the error in this case. > Maybe it's an error with some tags parameters, or branch in the Via > header. > > Here are the messages sent or received by the caller. Registrations have > been done for both caller and callee > > FYI : the "_" at the end of lines come from the log file, they are > not present in the real messages. > > > INVITE sip:[email protected] <sip%[email protected]>SIP/2.0_ > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > xxx.xx.33.225:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-9913-1-0_ > From: caller <sip:[email protected]:5060>;tag=1_ > To: callee <sip:[email protected]:5060>_ > Call-ID: [email protected]_ > CSeq: 1 INVITE_ > Contact: sip:[email protected]:5060_ > Max-Forwards: 70_ > Subject: Performance Test_ > Content-Type: application/sdp_ > Content-Length: 135_ > > v=0_ > o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 xxx.xx.33.225_ > s=-_ > c=IN IP4 xxx.xx.33.225_ > t=0 0_ > m=audio 6000 RTP/AVP 0_ > a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- ----------------------- > > SIP/2.0 100 Trying_ > CSeq: 1 INVITE_ > To: "callee" <sip:[email protected]:5060>_ > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > xxx.xx.33.225:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-9913-1-0_ > From: "caller" <sip:[email protected]:5060>;tag=1_ > Call-ID: [email protected]_ > Content-Length: 0_ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- ----------------------- > > > SIP/2.0 180 Ringing_ > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > xxx.xx.33.228:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bK525400123460-2291563385-228-ia8ih o! > 413-59a22286e36fe9b4dbfb591fca6180e9, SIP/2.0/UDP > xxx.xx.33.225:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-9913-1-0_ > From: "caller" <sip:[email protected]:5060>;tag=1_ > To: "callee" <sip:[email protected]:5060>;tag=1_ > Call-ID: [email protected]_ > CSeq: 1 INVITE_ > Contact: <sip:xxx.xx.32.233:5060;transport=UDP>_ > Content-Length: 0_ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- ---------------------------- > > SIP/2.0 200 OK_ > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > xxx.xx.33.228:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bK525400123460-2291563385-228-ia8ih o!41 3-59a22286e36fe9b4dbfb591fca6180e9, > SIP/2.0/UDP xxx.xx.33.225:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-9913-1-0_ > From: "caller" <sip:[email protected]:5060>;tag=1_ > To: "callee" <sip:[email protected]:5060>;tag=1_ > Call-ID: [email protected]_ > CSeq: 1 INVITE_ > Contact: <sip:xxx.xx.32.233:5060;transport=UDP>_ > Content-Type: application/sdp_ > Content-Length: 131_ > > v=0_ > o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 127.0.0.1_ > s=-_ > t=0 0_ > c=IN IP4 xxx.xx.32.233_ > m=audio 6000 RTP/AVP 0_ > a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- -------------------------------------------- > > ACK sip:[email protected] <sip%[email protected]>SIP/2.0_ > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > xxx.xx.33.225:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-9913-1-4_ > From: caller <sip:[email protected]:5060>;tag=1_ > To: callee <sip:[email protected]:5060>;tag=1_ > Call-ID: [email protected]_ > CSeq: 1 ACK_ > Contact: sip:[email protected]:5060_ > Max-Forwards: 70_ > Subject: Performance Test_ > Content-Length: 0_ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- -------------------------- > > BYE sip:[email protected] <sip%[email protected]>SIP/2.0_ > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > xxx.xx.33.225:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-9913-1-5_ > From: caller <sip:[email protected]:5060>;tag=1_ > To: callee <sip:[email protected]:5060>;;tag=1_ > Call-ID: [email protected]_ > CSeq: 2 BYE_ > Contact: sip:[email protected]:5060_ > Max-Forwards: 70_ > Subject: Performance Test_ > Content-Length: 0_ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- ---------------------------- > > SIP/2.0 481 Call/Transaction does not exist_ > CSeq: 2 BYE_ > To: "callee" <sip:[email protected]:5060>;;tag=1_ > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > xxx.xx.33.225:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-9913-1-5_ > From: "caller" <sip:[email protected]:5060>;tag=1_ > Call-ID: [email protected]_ > Content-Length: 0_ > > > > > Any idea where the error could come from? > > Regards > > Antoine > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > -- Thanks & Regards, Noble Antony Thattil. -- Thanks & Regards, Noble Antony Thattil. _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
