2010/2/5 Brett Tate <[email protected]>: >> So for me, all the text in RFC 3261/3263 about 503 doesn't exist >> as it designed to work in a happy universe so far from here. > > The 503 works; the issue with the 503 containing Retry-After.
As I said (and also the RFC 5390) ISUP<->SIP conversion makes usage of 503 for some ISUP codes whch don't mean "the server is unavailable", so IMHO 503 means nothing about the availability of the server. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
