I don't know why but they removed the "hookflash" event when they went to RFC 4733. (but event 16 isn't taken anyway)
Regarding your SDP: The server might not like the 0.0.0.0 in the o= line? -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Iñaki Baz Castillo Sent: 16 February 2010 09:00 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] (DTMF) Is RFC 4733 compatible with RFC 2833? El Martes, 16 de Febrero de 2010, Iñaki Baz Castillo escribió: > Is there something wrong in this SDP negoziation? (I don't think so, > but could be wrong). > Also, it's not clear for me how a UA tells the peer UA that it would > use RFC 4733 rather than RFC 2833. By reading the RFC 4733 it seems that it should be compatible with RFC 2833. So is there any reason this not to happen? -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
