On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 11:01 +0530, Bajaj, Gagandeep wrote: > Hi Dale > > Thanks for the response. > > Referring to RFC 5359, my question is regarding F15 containing sipfrag > body with "SIP/2.0 488 Not acceptable".
There is no such F15 in RFC 5359 -- the only F15 in section 2.4 contains a sipfrag body with "SIP/2.0 200". Please clarify what section of RFC 5359 you are referring to and what, if any, changes to it you are contemplating. Dale _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
