2010/5/19 RAVI KUMAR <[email protected]>: > Now my question is what should be ideal behaviour in this case ? > > 1. we should not expect two different call-ID as a part of same invite > message at the first point itself as callID is unique for the call? We can > say invite itself is not proper ?
This is invalid. 400 should be a proper response. > 2. we should process the invite message and check the integrity of message ? > since we have two different call - ID as a part of same invite message ,we > should send 4xx bad request. Yes, 400. No more. > 3. Concatenating the call-ID is nowhere expected ? Anyother possible > solution? It makes no sense at all. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
