Thanks for the quotation. It's exactly what I needed :) 2010/6/14, Victor Pascual Avila <[email protected]>: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, after reading RFC 3311 (UPDATE method) and RFC 4028 (Session >> Timers) it's not clear for me if I can use UPDATE requests and >> responses with no SDP offer/answers after the dialog is established. > > From RFC 4028: > > It is RECOMMENDED that the UPDATE request not contain an > offer [4], but a re-INVITE SHOULD contain one, even if the details of > the session have not changed. In that case, the offer MUST indicate > that it has not changed. In the case of SDP, this is accomplished by > including the same value for the origin field as did previous SDP > messages to its peer. > -- > Victor Pascual Ávila >
-- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
