> "Diversion" draft is expired but there is a new RFC for this stuff > (History-Info header): > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4244
For clarity, the use of diversion became a historic RFC this year since many vendors use it: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5806 However I agree with Inaki that RFC 4244 (and now draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis) is the IETF's solution/preference instead of RFC 5806. _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
