yes yes in that case it shud send PRACK. I am sorry in the first mail it was the same rseq. Apologies for ignoring.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> wrote: > 2010/7/21 $...@r\/|>r!`/@ <[email protected]>: > > > For UAC behavior section 4 says > > " Handling of subsequent reliable provisional responses for the same > initial > > request follows the same rules as above, with the following difference: > > reliable provisional responses are guaranteed to be in order. As a > result, > > if the UAC receives another reliable provisional response to the same > > request, and its RSeq value is not one higher than the value of the > sequence > > number, that response MUST NOT be acknowledged with a PRACK, and MUST NOT > be > > processed further by the UAC. An implementation MAY discard the response, > or > > MAY cache the response in the hopes of receiving the missing > responses.The > > UAC MAY acknowledge reliable provisional responses received after the > final > > response or MAY discard them." > > But in the given case the UAS sends a new reliable response with RSeq > + 1 after the first one (RSeq=1) is acknowledged, so the UAC should > send a PRACK, am I right? > > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo > <[email protected]> > -- cheers!!!! sarvpriya _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
