> AFAIK there is a new condition introduced by OMA (OMA = IM/Presence > for Mobile Operators obsessed with PushToTalk and private IP > networks). > That new condition is called "other-identity" [*] and its meaning is > that any URI matches it. >
Any URI which doesn't match any identity condition. If a URI matches several rules and there is an identity or external list condition in any of them, that one should be applied, instead of the other-identity rule. > So, if the creation of such new condition has been required it means > that an empty <conditions> node isn't equivalent to "always true", am > I wrong? > Maybe, but I couldn't find any reference to this :-) -- /Saúl http://saghul.net | http://sipdoc.net _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
