We rarely revise RFCs solely to clarify the wording. Sometimes we issue
clarifying RFCs instead. Or the clarification is simply captured as an
errata and then it will be incorporated if/when the RFC is revised.
Thanks,
Paul
On 11/29/2010 11:20 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2010/11/29 Schwarz, Albrecht (Albrecht)<albrecht.schw...@alcatel-lucent.com>:
>> Asymmetric media configurations are in general possible.
>> See SDP Offer/Answer, RFC 3264.
>> Both directions are independent.
>> Thus, different media configurations may be negotiated for the two
>> Offerer-to-Answerer directions.
>
>
>
>> To the folks responsible for these RFCs:
>> this is a FAQ since years and years, it would be really beneficial to make
>> such conceptual things more explicit in the RFC texts.
>
> I strongly agree.
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
