> I would; I can't see a lot of value in rejecting an SDP offer because of a > change like this. In Asterisk we've got a configuration option to not > require SDP version number changes on received offers because there are at > least two implementations out there that don't bother to increase the > version number even though the offer has changed... but we can go ahead and > accept it anyway, since it's possible for the session to work as the user > expects in spite of the protocol violation. >
Thanks for the comments! -- /Saúl http://saghul.net | http://sipdoc.net _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
