22 mar 2011 kl. 15.45 skrev Worley, Dale R (Dale): > In a sense, the SBC is allowed to reject any request it doesn't like for any > reason, because it is a B2BUA. > > But a well-behaved SBC should accept any syntactically valid Record-Route > header, and as far as I can tell without sending the request through a > parser, this Record-Route appears to be syntactically correct. Note the > language in RFC 3261 section 12.1.1 emphasizes that SIP elements must be able > to correctly handle Record-Route values that contain parameters that they do > not recognize.
I would like to emphasize the "without sending the request through a parser" part. That will be very important as IPv4 servers will be able to receive traffic with IPv6 addresses that they simply can not parse - but still have to handle correctly. /O http://www.facebook.com/sipv6 <- SIP & IPv6 page for discussions :-) _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
