2011/5/2 Brett Tate <[email protected]>: >> > I agree that it is appropriate when 488 is the best >> > response. If not opposed to 6xx responses, the 606 >> > may be more accurate within some situations; however >> > draft-ietf-sipping-sip-offeranswer-14 just mentions 488. >> >> No please, avoid 6XX responses. If a UAS replies 606 to >> an initial INVITE it breaks the possible parallel forking. > > Sounds like you want sipcore to adopt draft-worley-6xx-considered-harmful.
I would prefer draft-sipcore-remove-6xx-responses :) -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
