2011/5/31 Harbhanu <[email protected]>: > On the other hand if the initial request has routes for both the legs of > proxy, then both of them shall be removed.
This was my bigger doubt. But what about in case the initial request arrives to the proxy with two Routes pointing both of them to legA of the proxy (from which the request arrives)? This is: Alice (1.1.1.10:5060) ---------------- Proxy (1.1.1.1:5060) INVITE sip:[email protected] SIP/2.0 Route: <sip:1.1.1.1:5060> Route: <sip:1.1.1.1> In this case, which is the advantage of non removing the second Route header? what could it be valid for? Thanks a lot. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
