2011/5/31 Brez Borland <[email protected]>: > That is a plausible approach indeed. I would love to see somebody to > contradict that by pointing to the document mandating the opposite. > Otherwise, IMHO that is a clear 'hole' in the SIP specification that's been > overlooked.
Also note that the case I described (multiple pre-loaded Routes pointing to the proxy itself) could not be considered a spiral as Route headers compute in spirals detection. So if according to RFC 3261 the proxy removes just one Route each time (for each loop) it would not detect a spiral. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
