On 07/29/2011 10:18 AM, Nitin Kapoor wrote: > Dear All, > > I have one Vendor those are using FreeSwitch and the call flow is like that. > > UAC<-------------> SBC<-----------------------> UAS(FreeSwitch) > > Now problem is as below.: > > Whenever my termination(UAS - FreeSwitch) is sending 183 w/SDP Session > progress in the correspondence of Initial Invite then they are sending below > Remote-Party-ID in 183 Session Progress, which my SBC successfully forwaded > to UAC. > > *183 Session Progress:* > > *Remote-Party-ID: "359897868816"<sip:[email protected] >> ;party=calling;privacy=off;screen=no* > > Now again when my Termination(UAS-FreeSwitch) is sending 200 OK w/SDP its > CHANGING the "Remote-Party-ID" as below. And my SBC is not forwarding this > 200 OK to UAC. > > *200 OK * > > *Remote-Party-ID: "Outbound Call"<sip:37868#[email protected] >> ;party=calling;privacy=off;screen=no* > > So my query is with all that can REMOTE-PARTY-ID is can be change in 183& > 200 OK to same INVITE?
Remote-Party-ID was only described in an Internet-Draft, which has long since expired. There is no other description of its usage beyond that draft (P-Asserted-Identity is the standard way of handling that information now). -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies Jabber: [email protected] | SIP: [email protected] | Skype: kpfleming 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
