Looks like it's a conflict request from a UAC. One can have multiple
Privacy header in SIP message with value specified as "user", "session",
"header", "critical". When it specifies "none" then other values are
meaningless.
I think you can choose behavior of "none". That's my 2 cents.
Thanks,
none: The user requests that a privacy service apply no privacy
functions to this message, regardless of any pre-provisioned
profile for the user or default behavior of the service. User
agents can specify this option when they are forced to route a
message through a privacy service which will, if no Privacy header
is present, apply some privacy functions which the user does not
desire for this message. Intermediaries MUST NOT remove or alter
a Privacy header whose priv-value is 'none'. User agents MUST NOT
populate any other priv-values (including 'critical') in a Privacy
header that contains a value of 'none'.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
prakash k
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 6:54 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Sip-implementors] In case of Two Privacy Header or Privacy
Headerhaving two values
Hi ,
Could anyone please clarify the what should be the behavior of SIP
Server ,
when it receives
Two Privacy Header
Privacy: none
Privacy: id
or
Privacy:none;id
which one should take preference.
Is it drafted anywhere in RFC.
--
Thanks
Prakash K
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
