On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Brez Borland <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Mark, > > I think that INVITE has to be answered. This is what "RFC3261, Section > 14.1 UAC Behavior" says: > > Note that a UAC MUST NOT initiate a new INVITE transaction within a > dialog while another INVITE transaction is in progress in > either direction. > > From here I deduct that in Adam's case his INVITE transaction is pending, > and he cannot act upon the REFER (by initializing another INVITE) while he > is waiting for that INVITE to finish. > > *apologies, I meant to say re-INVITE in all the above". Therefore, the UAS should not issue the REFER in the first place, but rather complete that re-INVITE, and when no INVITE/re-INVITE are in progress - send the REFER. _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
