Hello Nitin Kapoor,

 

 

Do you have the first OFFER and ANSWER  ?

 

 

The first offer CODECS:  4 18 101  , we have to see the ANSWER  , at
moment looks ok , the session-ID is "o=Sonus_UAC 16515 29422"

 

v=0

o=Sonus_UAC 16515 29422 IN IP4 209.58.46.49

s=SIP Media Capabilities

c=IN IP4 209.58.46.40

t=0 0

m=audio 11516 RTP/AVP 4 18 101

a=rtpmap:4 G723/8000

a=fmtp:4 bitrate=6.3

a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000

a=fmtp:18 annexb=no

a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000

a=fmtp:101 0-15

a=sendrecv

a=maxptime:30

 

 

 

now the second OFFER , by re-invite  codec G729  , the CODEC now is a
new One and the maxptime can be changed to 20 , and the session-ID tell
us that there is a new offer , session-id increase " o=Sonus_UAC 16515
29423"

 

v=0

o=Sonus_UAC 16515 29423 IN IP4 209.58.46.49

s=SIP Media Capabilities

c=IN IP4 209.58.46.40

t=0 0

m=audio 11516 RTP/AVP 18

a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000

a=fmtp:18 annexb=no

a=sendrecv

a=maxptime:20

 

 

 

+++++++++++++++++++++

 

 

G723 -->  packetization period can be 10 , 20 , 30 ms

 

G729  --> The max  packetization period is 20 ms

 

+++++++++++++++++++++

 

Codec Information

Bandwidth Calculations

Codec & Bit Rate (Kbps) 

Codec Sample Size (Bytes)

Codec Sample Interval (ms)

Mean Opinion Score (MOS) 

Voice Payload Size (Bytes)

Voice Payload Size (ms)

Packets Per Second (PPS)

Bandwidth MP or FRF.12 (Kbps) 

Bandwidth w/cRTP MP or FRF.12 (Kbps) 

Bandwidth Ethernet (Kbps) 

G.711 (64 Kbps) 

80 Bytes

10 ms

4.1

160 Bytes 

20 ms

50

82.8 Kbps 

67.6 Kbps 

87.2 Kbps

G.729 (8 Kbps)

10 Bytes 

10 ms

3.92

20 Bytes 

20 ms

50

26.8 Kbps 

11.6 Kbps 

31.2 Kbps

G.723.1 (6.3 Kbps) 

24 Bytes

30 ms

3.9

24 Bytes 

30 ms

33.3

18.9 Kbps 

8.8 Kbps 

21.9 Kbps

G.723.1 (5.3 Kbps) 

20 Bytes

30 ms

3.8

20 Bytes 

30 ms

33.3

17.9 Kbps 

7.7 Kbps 

20.8 Kbps

G.726 (32 Kbps) 

20 Bytes

5 ms

3.85

80 Bytes 

20 ms

50

50.8 Kbps 

35.6 Kbps 

55.2 Kbps

G.726 (24 Kbps) 

15 Bytes

5 ms

 

60 Bytes 

20 ms

50

42.8 Kbps 

27.6 Kbps 

47.2 Kbps

G.728 (16 Kbps) 

10 Bytes

5 ms

3.61

60 Bytes 

30 ms

33.3

28.5 Kbps 

18.4 Kbps 

31.5 Kbps

G722_64k(64 Kbps) 

80 Bytes

10 ms

4.13

160 Bytes

20 ms

50

82.8 Kbps

67.6Kbps

87.2 Kbps

ilbc_mode_20(15.2Kbps)

38 Bytes

20 ms

NA

38 Bytes

20 ms

50

34.0Kbps

18.8 Kbps

38.4Kbps

ilbc_mode_30(13.33Kbps)

                                                                        

 

 

 

 

 

Regards!

Valdemar

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ext
Nitin Kapoor
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 1:53 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [Sip-implementors] 488 Not Acceptable Here

 

Dear Friends,

 

I am facing the problem with one of my customer where first the calls
has

been connected successfully and then UAC sends the re-invite my SBC
sends

488 back to UAC.

 

When UAC sends the Initial OFFER i had below SDP. (UAC --- SBC) and i
can

see the "ptime" value is 30 and calls established.

 

v=0

o=Sonus_UAC 16515 29422 IN IP4 209.58.46.49

s=SIP Media Capabilities

c=IN IP4 209.58.46.40

t=0 0

m=audio 11516 RTP/AVP 4 18 101

a=rtpmap:4 G723/8000

a=fmtp:4 bitrate=6.3

a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000

a=fmtp:18 annexb=no

a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000

a=fmtp:101 0-15

a=sendrecv

a=maxptime:30

 

Now when UAC sends the re-invite we have below SDP. If you can see in

re-invite "ptime" value has been changed.. Is that acceptable?  Or you
have

seen any other thing in SDP.

 

v=0

o=Sonus_UAC 16515 29423 IN IP4 209.58.46.49

s=SIP Media Capabilities

c=IN IP4 209.58.46.40

t=0 0

m=audio 11516 RTP/AVP 18

a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000

a=fmtp:18 annexb=no

a=sendrecv

a=maxptime:20

 

Could anyone please give some shadow on this. Thanks in Advance.

 

Regards,

Nitin Kapoor

_______________________________________________

Sip-implementors mailing list

[email protected]

https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to