Hi Rohan,

find the following cases for more clarification. This is irrespective of
late offer/answer or regular offer/answer scenarios.

case-1: if single m= line with multiple codecs comes in offer. The answerer
must send either *single m= line with a negotiated single codec* or *single
m= line with supported list codecs* also (depends on implementation).

case-2: if multiple m= line with single codec each comes in offer. The
answerer must send same number of m= lines with negotiated codec each in m=
lines in SDP.

hope this clears your doubt. I think yours focus is "case-1"

Refer : RFC-3407 and RFC - 3388

Regards,
Praveen


On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Roshan nampeli
<[email protected]>wrote:

>  Hi Praveen,
>
> Thank you for the response.
> So it means that in case of single m-line in the ACK, there should be only
> one codec right?
> If the other party reponds in 200 ACK with multiple codecs in the same
> m-line then its wrong. Am I correct ?
>
>
> Thanks a lot,
> Roshan.
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* praveena ss [[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Friday, February 24, 2012 1:02 AM
> *To:* satish agrawal; Roshan nampeli
> *Cc:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding SDP answer in ACK
>
>  Hi Rohan,
>
> its not a mandatory that delayed answer should add all codec supported in
> a same m= line of 200+SDP. if multiple codecs are coming in multiple m=
> lines in 200+SDP then u must add same number of m= lines with respective
> codec in ACK+SDP.
>
> In non multiple m= lines scenario, u can only add selected codec, in your
> case it's '0 pcmu'.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Praveen
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:09 PM, satish agrawal 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi Roshan,
>>
>> This is the scenario of late offer answer, Its work
>> perfectly. Because codec offer from side B in 200 ok
>> and answer from side A in ACK.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Satish
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Roshan nampeli
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > In the SIP sdp offer/answer scenario suppose  A sends INVITE without SDP
>> > to B.
>> > B then replies with all the codecs it supports (say 0,8,4,18).
>> > Then is it proper for A to reply in ACK with all codecs (say 0,8,18,4) ?
>> >
>> > A-----------INVITE(no sdp)----------> B
>> > A<------------100 trying--------------B
>> > A<------------180ringing-------------B
>> > A<-----------200Ok(0,8,4,18)--------B
>> > A-----------ACK(0,8,18,4)----------->B
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance,
>> > Roshan.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from
>> > HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is
>> > listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way
>> > (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure,
>> reproduction,
>> > or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is
>> > prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the
>> sender
>> > by phone or email immediately and delete it!
>> >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Sip-implementors mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sip-implementors mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>>
>
>
>
> --
> ------------------------------
> Thanks and Regards,
>  Praveen
>
>


-- 
------------------------------
Thanks and Regards,
Praveen
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to