Hi Vineet,
If Bob support only one codec in answer, out of all codec Sended by Alice
in his offer, then there is no need to send re-INVITE to lock the single
supported codec.

Regards,
Satish


On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Vineet Menon <[email protected]>wrote:

> HI list, Hi Robert,
>
> What about the case when UAS responds with just one codec? Would OPAL make
> the UAC send a reINVITE with that again??
> Something like this,
>
> UAC -------------------INVITE/ 261,263,264 ----------> UAS
> UAC <-------------------200/OK/ 264------------------------ UAS
> UAC -------------------   reINVITE/264----------------------UAS
>                      ???????????
> UAC <--------------------200/OK/264------------------------UAS
>                       ???????????
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Vineet Menon
>
>
>
>
> On 7 March 2012 01:28, Worley, Dale R (Dale) <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > From: Paul Kyzivat [[email protected]]
> > >
> > > Another is when multiple RTP streams are multiplexed on the same RTP
> > > session - distinguished by SSRC. (I may have the terminology wrong
> > > there.) This hasn't been considered much in sip until recently, but is
> > > now increasingly going to be used.
> >
> > I don't know if it is done much, but that would be natural in
> > conferencing situations, with the conference focus simply copying the
> > chosen incoming stream to all the outgoing streams.  As the chosen
> > speaker changes, the outgoing streams could switch between codecs.
> >
> > > From: Robert Jongbloed [[email protected]]
> > >
> > > I know there are some implementations that do exactly this for audio.
> The
> > > OPAL implementation unfortunately is not designed to wait till the
> first
> > RTP
> > > packet arrives before creating codecs, starting video grabbers, blah,
> > blah,
> > > blah. It does it when the 200 OK arrives. So, OPAL gets around the
> > ambiguity
> > > by immediately sending a re-INVITE selecting one of the codecs the
> remote
> > > answered with.
> >
> > Yeah, but the "remote" can refuse the re-INVITE, forcing OPAL to
> > continue to accept all the codecs that it offered in the first place.
> >
> > Dale
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sip-implementors mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>



-- 
Thanks & Regards
Satish Agrawal
New Delhi-24.
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to