> From: Pranab Bohra [[email protected]] > > Wouldn't it make better sense for the Transferee to send an inactive > SDP to the transferor once it detects that there's early media on the > secondary call-leg?
It would work. Of course, if the early media *stops* (before the call is answered), the transferee should reverse the inactive SDP. But in practice, the events are fairly closely spaced, so it's probably more efficient to simply ignore the undesired media than engage in signalling to prevent it from being sent. > I feel that the media termination endpoints (UA in this case) should > use the following logic: At a given time, there could be multiple > media paths connected to an endpoint, but only one of them must be > active. But if the call is forked, different forks may be receiving messages at the same time. Humans can dissect overlapping audio messages, and the information they extract may be useful to them. Dale _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
