2012/4/10 Nataraju A.B <[email protected]>: >> 1) IN-DIALOG-1 = INVITE, IN-DIALOG-2 = BYE >> >> Should bob reply 200 to the BYE and later a final response for the INVITE? > > [ABN] Yes, it must reply BYE with 200. > If the INVITE is received by UAS after sending 200-BYE, then INVITE must be > replied with FINAL error response 487.
Ok. >> 2) IN-DIALOG-1 = INVITE, IN-DIALOG-2 = INVITE >> >> What should reply bob for the second INVITE? > > [ABN] this is an incorrect behavior from UAC. because this (2nd INVITE) > lead to overlapped offer-answer request. In this case it is expected that > UAS reply with 491 Request pending. The same as I've replied to the other mail: Why? RFC 3261 section 14.2 states that 491 is sent by a UAS that has received an in-dialog request while a previous in-dialog request sent *by him* has got no final response yet. It's not the same scenario. >> 3) IN-DIALOG-1 = INVITE, IN-DIALOG-2 = OPTIONS >> >> And here? > > [ABN] Both requests must handled with out any issue. Ok >> 3) IN-DIALOG-1 = INFO, IN-DIALOG-2 = OPTIONS >> >> And here? > > [ABN] Both requests must handled with out any issue. Ok. Thanks a lot. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
