On 6/5/12 1:31 AM, kiran kumar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a doubt regarding Cseq value while processing 3xx responses.
> According to RFC 3261 8.1.3.4 the new invite request for the redirected
> address can use the same Cseq value.
It actually says SHOULD.
> According to RFC 3665 3.6 call flows, the CSeq value is incremented for the
> new invite request while processing the 3xx response.
> Is it mandatory to increment the CSeq value in this scenario ?
Note that 3665 isn't normative. So when in doubt you must follow a
normative source - 3261 in this case.
While not clear in 3261, there are two distinct situations here:
- recursion by the UAC, such as in 3665 6.3
- recursion by a proxy
When a proxy is doing the recursion, it MUST retain the CSeq value.
Otherwise the UAC would be confused.
When the UAC is doing the recursion it really doesn't matter.
Thanks,
Paul
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
