Thanks Brett, appreciate it. So I guess since the URI in the example below contains a semicolon, it has to have angular brackets. > P-Asserted-Identity: sip:[email protected];user=phone ---------not > good
> P-Asserted-Identity: <sip:[email protected];user=phone> > ------------ good Vivek. From: Brett Tate <[email protected]> To: Vivek Singla <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 3:05 PM Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] Angular brackets for P-Asserted-Identity RFC 3261 section 20: The Contact, From, and To header fields contain a URI. If the URI contains a comma, question mark or semicolon, the URI MUST be enclosed in angle brackets (< and >). Any URI parameters are contained within these brackets. If the URI is not enclosed in angle brackets, any semicolon-delimited parameters are header-parameters, not URI parameters. > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:sip- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Vivek Singla > Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 3:58 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Sip-implementors] Angular brackets for P-Asserted-Identity > > Hi, > > I have a question regarding the format of the header p-asserted- > identity. > > P-Asserted-Identity: sip:[email protected];user=phone > > P-Asserted-Identity: <sip:[email protected];user=phone> > > Which one of the above is correct as per specs? > > Please let me know where in rfc 3261 or any other to find out that both > of them are acceptable. > > I'd really appreciate. > > Vivek. _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
