Hi Brett,

Earlier also, I have gone through behavior described in RFC 6337 but still not 
clear about the behavior.

RFC 6337 says:
5. PRACK Req. (**)      200 PRACK Resp. followed by new offer
                             OR termination of dialog

If offer in PRACK is rejected then UAS should respond with 200 OK followed by 
BYE(i.e. termination of dialog) or new offer.
Let say, we opt for terminating the dialog.
But, sending BYE would terminate the call where offer answer is already 
negotiated.
Is this the correct behavior to implement or should we reject only PRACK and 
dialog should not get impacted?

Regards,
Kamini

-----Original Message-----
From: Brett Tate [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 4:34 PM
To: Kamini Gangwani; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Query regarding PRACK offer rejection

See RFC 6337 section 2.3's open issue concerning 488.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:sip-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Kamini
> Gangwani
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 6:51 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] Query regarding PRACK offer rejection
>
> Hi All,
>
> What should be the behavior of UAS when a new offer received in PRACK
> is not acceptable?
>
> Following is the behavior:
> UAC                                 UAS
> ---INVITE(Offer1)--->
> <---- 183 (Answer1)-
> --- PRACK (Offer2)---> (Not accepted by UAS)
>
> How should it be rejected?
> Does any standards or RFCs says anything about this?
>
>
> Regards,
> Kamini





===============================================================================
Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html
for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication.
===============================================================================

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to