Paul,

Sorry.  I mistyped UAC.  I meant to say UAC.  Not UAS.  Corrected text:

Thanks for the response.  Is there any way to know how many forks were made by 
a proxy.  My application is VoIP.  I need to provide some kind of error tone 
when the UAC determines that the call cannot be landed on any of the forks.  
Ideally, I would like to know the total number of forks made by the proxy and 
provide error tone to the voice user when all the forks responsed with error 
final responsed.

Thanks again for your time.

- ramesh

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ramesh 
Babu Kuppili
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:51 AM
To: Paul Kyzivat; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] change in tag field in To header

Paul,

Thanks for the response.  Is there any way to know how many forks were made by 
a proxy.  My application is VoIP.  I need to provide some kind of error tone 
when the UAS determines that the call cannot be landed on any of the forks.  
Ideally, I would like to know the total number of forks made by the proxy and 
provide error tone to the voice user when all the forks responsed with error 
final responsed.

Thanks again for your time.

- ramesh 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul 
Kyzivat
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 3:50 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] change in tag field in To header

On 2/27/13 12:38 AM, Ramesh Babu Kuppili wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am having a problem with the To tag in the incoming "603 Declined" from UAS.
>
> 1. Outgoing INVITE
>      - no tag in the To header.
> 2. Incoming "183 Session Progress"
>      - To tag - tag=h7g4Esbg_p65547t1361882364m374065c90075s1_4069438959-13. 
> Incoming "603 Declined"
>      - To tag -
> tag=h7g4Esbg_p65547t1361882364m374065c90075s1_4069388685-1940037509
> Can the To tag change from "183 Session Progress" to "603 Declined".  How do 
> the UAS handle this?

Yes.

This is consistent with the request having been forked by a proxy.
The 183 came from one fork. Then the 603 came from a different fork. 
Once this has happened, you generally will get no further response from the 
first fork.

        Good Luck,
        Paul

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to