Thanks Brett. Cheers, Aman
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Brett Tate <br...@broadsoft.com> wrote: > > UAC is not identifying the "100 Trying", "180 Ringing" > > and "200 OK" received from the terminating side and > > keep retransmitting the "INVITE" to the terminating > > side because UAS has changed the B-Number in the "100 > > Trying", "180 Ringing" and "200 OK". > > > > Is this a correct behavior? > > The UAS (or proxy) is non compliantly altering the To URI. RFC 4916 does > provide a mechanism to allow URI changes; however it doesn't apply to > responses and has other restrictions. > > It is a non compliant abnormal situation; thus the UAC can basically > however it wants. > > > I'm unable to see the ideal behavior in the RFC for > > this scenario, I believe instead of ignoring the > > incoming 100, 180 & 200 received from terminating > > side, UAC should generate a valid response to these > > incoming messages. > > The UAS "should generate a valid response". The UAC can basically act > however it wants. > > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
