I'm not sure what you are referring to as the owner address. If it is something which should match the connection address for security or other reasons, talk to the MGW vendor or administrator, there might be a configuration option to produce the behavior that you are expecting.
As an fyi, the straw working group is attempting to standardize some B2BUA behavior. http://tools.ietf.org/wg/straw/ > -----Original Message----- > From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip- > implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Sourav Dhar > Chaudhuri > Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 8:46 AM > To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > Subject: [Sip-implementors] SDP reply incident > > Hi, > I am observing a SDP reply from an INVITE mentioned below. Please let > me know whether the response can B is valid > > > A calls B; > A's call agent is 1.1.1.1 & > Media GW is 1.1.1.2 > B's call Agent is 2.2.2.1 and B's Media gw is 2.2.2.2 in INVITE request, A send > the SDP, In that A will send its MGW's IP in > C=1.1.1.2 > Connection Address: 1.1.1.2 > Owner Address: 1.1.1.2 > but problem is, when B > replies in 200OK ........... in that.. > B is sending Owner address as > 2.2.2.2 and connection address as 2.2.2.1 Owner address is B's CA, not MGW > > Is this correct response. _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
