Things are clear now, thanks Brett. Cheers, Aman
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Brett Tate <br...@broadsoft.com> wrote: > > So UAC should send the PRACK to each 183 received > > (with new 'To Tag') from P2? > > From an RFC perspective, the UAC must support INVITE forking interactions > (i.e. potential for multiple early/confirmed dialogs). However as > discussed > within draft-jesske-dispatch-forking-answer-correlation-03, not every UAC > is > compliant. > > > > Is this the desired behavior as per the RFC? > > Yes; support for forking is not optional within RFC 3261. > > Similarly, RFC 3262 section 4 indicates the following. > > "The provisional response MUST establish a dialog if one is not yet > created. > > Assuming the response is to be transmitted reliably, the UAC MUST > create a new request with method PRACK. This request is sent within > the dialog associated with the provisional response (indeed, the > provisional response may have created the dialog)." > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
