Hi, RFC 3261 section 7.3.1 presents the following common header format.
field-name: field-value *(;parameter-name=parameter-value) Does RFC 3261 or another RFC indicate if the order of the parameters defaults to being significant or insignificant? RFC 3261 section 19.1.4 indicates the parameter ordering within SIP URI is insignificant. However, I haven't found anything definitive for the parameters within a SIP header field. Thanks, Brett _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
