> The violation is: > > "When a reliable provisional response contains a session description, and > is > the first to do so, then that session description is the answer to the > offer > in the INVITE request. The answer cannot be updated, and a new offer > cannot > be sent in a subsequent reliable response for the same INVITE > transaction." > > The only thing left to interpretation IMO is if version increment with no > SDP change is considered an update. > > Thoughts on this?
The SDP is not an updated answer. The SDP is not a new offer. It is an SDP that RFC 3261 says must be ignored. _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
