Maxim Sobolev <sobo...@sippysoft.com> writes: > I respectfully disagree on that, there are many places throughout RFC where > "header field values" refer specifically to the whole part after "Foo:", > not just some piece of it (see my other message with a specific example > referring to Vias). In fact I think "Via header" is kinda jargon, which if > defined properly consists of "Via header field name" + ":" + "Via header > field value".
I agree with you there. And Robert Sparks is very particular about using "header field" rather than "header"... Dale _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
