thanks I'll try that argument with them :-) On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:22 PM Roman Shpount <ro...@telurix.com> wrote:
> Hi All: > > This is all based on https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3264#section-8 > > First it states: *We refer to the last SDP provided as the "previous > SDP".* > This clearly states last SDP sent , not the last SDP accepted. > > Then., later it states: *When issuing an offer that modifies the > session, the "o=" line of the new SDP MUST be identical to that in > the previous SDP, except that the version in the origin field > MUST increment by one from the previous SDP.* > > So, based on this the version should be +1 of the version in the last sent > SDP, i.e. 3. > > Regards, > _____________ > > Roman Shpount > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
