On 8 September 2017 at 01:58, Dale R. Worley <wor...@ariadne.com> wrote:
> neil corcoran <n...@corcoran.name> writes: > > We then send CANCEL in accordance with > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261#section-9.1 > > > > we send this to the same destination as the original INVITE and don't > > include the Route headers or from the 183 > > The concept is that the CANCEL is a follow-up or "second half" of the > INVITE, it's not a later transaction (which might be affected by the > responses that the INVITE received). > > Dale > Thanks everyone for the clarification. Neil _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
