> On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 7:33 PM, Dale R. Worley <wor...@ariadne.com> wrote:
>
>> Zuniga, Guillermo <guillermo.zun...@cwpanama.com> writes:
>> > I Access enviroment not PEER to PEER connection, CONTACT could be
>> > anonymous or always should be any valid uri-user?
>>
>> The Contact always has to be a valid URI.  However, that URI does not
>> have to be the AOR (address-of-record) of a customer; it just has to be
>> able to reach the UA (when used by the next proxy in the signaling
>> path).

There are a lot of complexities.  Certainly, the Contact has to be a
syntactically correct URI.  But there are various ways to avoid
divulging user-sensitive information.  See

3323 A Privacy Mechanism for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP). J.
     Peterson. November 2002. (Format: TXT=54116 bytes) (Status: PROPOSED
     STANDARD) (DOI: 10.17487/RFC3323) 

5379 Guidelines for Using the Privacy Mechanism for SIP. M. Munakata, S.
     Schubert, T. Ohba. February 2010. (Format: TXT=52595 bytes) (Status:
     INFORMATIONAL) (DOI: 10.17487/RFC5379) 

5767 User-Agent-Driven Privacy Mechanism for SIP. M. Munakata, S.
     Schubert, T. Ohba. April 2010. (Format: TXT=23270 bytes) (Status:
     INFORMATIONAL) (DOI: 10.17487/RFC5767) 

Dale
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to