Hi,

I assume this discussion can be moved to SIPCORE, because I don't think 
DISPATCH needs to discuss the need for a new SIP response code, and where the 
work defining such would be done.

Regards,

Christer



________________________________
From: dispatch <dispatch-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Ranjit Avasarala 
<ranjitka...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2019 6:05 AM
To: sipc...@ietf.org <sipc...@ietf.org>; dispa...@ietf.org <dispa...@ietf.org>; 
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu <Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu>
Subject: [dispatch] Proposal for a mew SIP 4xx Error code

Hello all

Many times I experienced scenarios where SIP requests (e.g. INVITE, PUBLISH or 
PRACK or any other) have either invalid parameters in the header or a 
particular header is missing in the request or the header value is incomplete.  
Some 
e.gs<https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=7d7bb417-21f196fe-7d7bf48c-0cc47ad93e2e-34af2a5be94ea08e&q=1&e=c2646b0c-e4da-4248-94ca-d03438b18bb9&u=http%3A%2F%2Fe.gs%2F>
 are

  *   SIP Route header in INVITE contains additional "lr" parameter. Ideally, 
"lr" parameter needs to be associated with a particular route - i.e. sip URI
  *   the Accept header is missing in SIP PUBLISH
  *   the Allow header misses UPDATE method
  *   .....  many more

Currently, in all the above cases the SIP Proxy server that receives the 
request, responds with a 400 Bad Request.
Though 400 Bad Request is acceptable given that there is some issue in the SIP 
request, a more detailed error would be more useful - as sometimes interpreting 
400 Bad Request is harder
E.g.
a  4xx Invalid header/parameter may be more appropriate with reason
E.g. if there is additional "lr" parameter in SIP INVITE, then the proxy can 
return a 4xx Invalid Header/parameter with Reason:  SIP code=4xx; Text="Invalid 
lr parameter in Route header"

Let me know your thoughts on if this proposal can be taken forward as an 
Internet draft.

Thank you
Ranjit


_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to