That seems also like very good sense, Thanks ! BR/pj
Sensitivity: Internal -----Original Message----- From: Dale R. Worley <wor...@ariadne.com> Sent: den 23 januari 2020 04:21 To: Sundbaum Per-Johan (Telenor Sverige AB) <per-johan.sundb...@telenor.se> Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP version "Sundbaum Per-Johan (Telenor Sverige AB)" <per-johan.sundb...@telenor.se> writes: > What do you think about incrementing the version in SDP o-line, but > not changing anything else in SDP, should such a behavior be accepted > or should it be rejected ? There are two similar but distinctly different questions that you might be asking. The general principle is "Be conservative in what you produce and liberal in what you accept." If the question is, "Should a device increment the version in an SDP o-line but not change anything else?", as you note RFC 4028 says that a device should not do that. If the question is, "If a device receives SDP with an incremented version in the o-line that is otherwise identical to the preceding SDP, should it reject it?", the device should not reject it. Dale _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
