I think it will be easier to make progress on multipart/mixed than
multipart/alternative. It appears that making progress on alternative
will be difficult without some use cases to help in defining what it
means to "support" one of the alternatives.
Paul
Dan Wing wrote:
I have become convinced, through my efforts with RTPSEC, that
multipart/alternative is harmful if it contains multiple SDP parts.
Again, I am not in a position to disagree with you ,but is that
harmfulness documented somewhere?
Nope. If we're going to move multipart/* forward in SIP, though,
I'll be happy to write that section.
-d
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
