> > > What we really need to say is that multipart/alternative may be > > > used only when we > > > are using alternative payload types for the same > information. For > > > example, text/html and > > > text/xml or whatever. It would be applicable if one day we > > > re-created another SDPng for example. > > > > The perfect example for that is MESSAGE with text/plain and > text/html, > > quite analogous to an email message. > > That is sufficient justification to include multipart/alternative.
Exactly what I had in mind. I was suggesting we replace the SRTP example in the document with this example. _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
